Field-based Inter-comparison of an Indigenously Designed and Developed off-centric PM2.5 Impactor with a Standardized Impactor
Keywords:
Inertial impactor, PM2.5, Novel off-centric impactor, Reduced particle bounce-off, FE-SEMAbstract
Inertial impactors can segregate particles based on their inertia difference, although it is associated with an inherent problem of particle bounce-off, which yields errors in the particle collection. Previously we have developed a novel PM2.5 impactor with an off-centric rotating nozzle which has less tendency of particle bounce-off. In this study, we have evaluated the performance of this off-centric impactor by comparing it with a conventional impactor having the same flow rate and same cut-off diameter (PM2.5,15 LPM and sampling time: 24 h) through two sets of experiments. In experiment 1, the off-centric impactor was not rotated, and thus, it mimics like a conventional impactor. In experiment 2, the offcentric impactor was rotated to 90 degrees after each 6 h. For each set of experiments, we gravimetrically compared the filter substrate and the impaction surface from both the impactors. In experiment 2, the off-centric impactor exhibited a higher difference in the collected mass and greater impaction area than that in experiment 1, which is attributable to the reduction of particle bounce-off. We performed FESEM (Field Emission-Scanning Electron Microscope) analysis on the aerosol laden filters, which confirms the cut-off diameter of the novel off-centric to be PM2.5.